The Barnes Review May/June 2018






Leni Riefenstahl made her mark with the documentary “Olympiad” about the 1936 Summer Olympics in Berlin and her National Socialist propaganda films. Starting out as a dancer, she literally “broke a leg” to become a movie star and then the most important film director in Nazi Germany. Is she the greatest female film director of all time?



In the private view of the mass media, we live in a media-cracy. The people may elect a president, but if the Big Media do not like him they try to overthrow him. Richard Nixon and Donald Trump are two such. One promised to “clean house”; the other has sworn he will “drain the swamp.



You may not have heard of Edward Capehart O’Kelley, but he is the man who shot the man who is said to have shot Jesse James, the famous outlaw. Here is his saga.



Beginning in 1917, the real holocaust unfolded, not in Germany but in Russia, and not of Jews but of Christians by communists. Establishment outlets tell us Jews are “wrongfully accused” of inflicting bloody Bolshevism on the world. Who is correct? You decide.



Salvador Borrego will always be remembered as a titan of Revisionist history. While critical of the Jewish global elite, he noted that this did not make him anti-Jewish, any more than criticizing the Mexican government makes one anti-Mexican.



Was civil rights leader Martin Luther King killed by James Earl Ray, lone nut and smalltime white-collar common crook? Or was it a government operation? Overwhelming evidence points to a Deep State hit. Will justice ever be served in this assassination?



Is the United States “one nation, under God, indivisible,” as we have been trained to parrot? Was it ever? Why did ancient Israel of the Bible split in two? The Old Testament of the Bible is a gold mine of evidence that secession is a God-given right.



You have been told Sen. Robert F. Kennedy was murdered 50 years ago by a Palestinian named Sirhan Sirhan. But the shooting is obviously an extension of the JFK assassination five years earlier. Both killings were coups d’état— the RFK one eliminating the man who was sure to be elected president in 1968.



He left office a virtual pariah. But was the much-maligned Herbert Hoover an unsung hero? He is consistently ranked at the bottom of a list of America’s “best presidents.” But is this all just unceasing pro-FDR propaganda from the leftist press and academia? Hoover, it turns out, was an extraordinary man.



A constitution for the Germans would be nice, thought the Allies in 1949. The Soviets were now the largest threat to the West, and a transition from military occupation to self-governance was needed in Germany. But few know about the secret agreement arranged the night before the constitution was signed—May 23, 1949—sealing Germany’s fate until 2099.


Categories: ,



A new look at the career of one of the greatest, most maligned filmmakers of the 20th century

By John Wear

Leni Riefenstahl (1902- 2003) was an extraordinary wo man with an extraordinary career. Angeli ka Taschen wrote this about Riefenstahl: She began as a celebrated dancer in Berlin during the early 1920s, became an actress, then finally directed and produced her own films, several of which are among the most influential and most controversial in the history of film. Since the 1950s she traveled frequently to Africa and lived for extended periods in Sudan with the primitive Nuba tribes. Though long since a legend, she again attracted worldwide attention with her photographs of the Nubas. Then, at 71, she learned to dive and yet again turned her experiences into art with photographs of the undersea world.1 This article will focus on Leni Riefenstahl’s remarkable career and the impact her association with Adolf Hitler had on her public reputation. LENI RIEFENSTAHL: HITLER’S FILMMAKER A new look at the career of one of the greatest, most maligned filmmakers of the 20th century 4 •

Leni Riefenstahl showed an early interest in the arts, gymnastics and physical training. Her first career choice of dance allowed her to merge her athletic enthusiasm with her artistic interests and need to express herself. Riefenstahl began dance training at age 17, and by age 21 she was making highly successful public appearances as a dancer. She traveled throughout Germany and many neighboring countries, scheduling a dance performance almost every third day. In June 1924, she injured a knee during one of her leaps, forcing a cancellation of her tour. The resulting torn ligament in her knee ended her dancing career barely eight months after it had begun.2

Riefenstahl next pursued a career as an actress in “mountain films,” a genre specific to Germany that began its boom in the first half of the 1920s. The self-confident Riefenstahl was given the lead in the movie The Holy Mountain even though she had never appeared in a major role. The film opened in December 1926 and enjoyed great success with both critics and the public. Riefenstahl was celebrated in the press as a new type of film actress, and the term “sports actress” was coined for her.3 After acting in some more mountain movies, Riefenstahl starred in the movie S.O.S. Iceberg, set in Greenland. This film premiered on August 31, 1933, and was a big success.

Everyone wanted to see the first movie ever filmed in the fascinating setting of Greenland; theaters were sold out days in advance. Few would have guessed this would be the last film Riefenstahl would act in for many years to come.4 Riefenstahl also set out to secure her place in film history by acting as producer, director, screenwriter, editor and star of the movie The Blue Light. This movie used many real-life farmers as actors, and included many authentic images of farmhouses, alpine huts and village churches. The film opened on March 24, 1932, to mixed reviews.

Hitler was highly impressed by the realistic scenes of the farmers in the movie. He stated, “Riefenstahl does it the right way; she goes to the villages and picks out her actors herself.”5 HITLER’S FILMMAKER Riefenstahl was invited to meet with Hitler at the North Sea village of Horumersiel on May 22, 1932. Strolling on the beach, Hitler and Riefenstahl talked about her films, all of which Hitler had seen. Hitler said during the conversation, “Once we come to power, you must make my films.”6

Riefenstahl had read Mein Kampf and was willing to be Hitler’s filmmaker. Riefenstahl’s first movie for Hitler was Victory of Faith, which premiered on December 1, 1933. Since this movie showed repeated scenes of Ernst Röhm laughing or marching at Hitler’s side, it was withdrawn shortly after Röhm’s murder on July 1, 1934.7 The film was also not Riefenstahl’s best work. The photography is mediocre in substantial sections of the film, and it lacked the overall unity of her later films.8 Riefenstahl’s next film for Hitler, Triumph of the Will, was a huge artistic and financial success.

Steven Bach writes: Ordinary Germans’ response to Triumph of the Will was the measure of homeland success. The picture played in major theaters and minor, in school auditoriums and assembly halls, in churches and barracks. Its final revenues are not known, but Ufa [Universum Film AG] reported that the film had earned back its advance and gone into profit just two months after its release. … Agreement was all but universal that, at only 32, she had created a new kind of heroic cinema. With art and craft, she had wed power and poetry so compellingly as to challenge the artistry of anything remotely similar that had gone before. Her manipulation of formal elements was virtuosic; her innovations in shooting and editing set new standards and remain exemplary for filmmakers seven decades later, when the controversy the film continues to generate is, in itself, testimony to its effectiveness.9 After the opening of Triumph of the Will in March 1935, Riefenstahl made the 28-minute film Day of Freedom to glorify the German military. This movie served as a technical rehearsal for cameramen she had assembled for her next big assignment— the 1936 Berlin Olympics.10 Riefenstahl covered all 136

Olympic events since her contract required her to prepare a sports film archive from which short films could be made for educational use. She therefore told her extensive team of cameramen and assistants that “everything would have to be shot and from every conceivable angle.” Her film Olympia premiered on April 20, 1938, Hitler’s 49th birthday. Olympia was universally acclaimed, and Riefenstahl became the most celebrated woman in all of Germany.11

Upon the outbreak of World War II, Riefenstahl saved many of her colleagues from conscription by forming a combat photographic unit. A “Special Riefenstahl Film Unit” composed of her handpicked film personnel departed Berlin for the front on September 10, 1939. When gunfire shredded the canvas of her tent on September 12, Riefenstahl remarked, “I hadn’t imagined it would be this dangerous.” Riefenstahl resigned her commission after German anti-partisan activity in Konskie, Poland resulted in the deaths of approximately 30  Polish “civilians.”12

She spent much of the rest of the war working on the film Tiefland. This movie became one of the most expensive motion pictures in German film history. War conditions and Riefenstahl’s erratic health and personal life were major factors in the record-breaking five years it took to produce the movie. Riefenstahl was taken at the end of the war to an American detention camp where GIs too young to remember her face on the covers of Time and Newsweek examined her identity papers. 13


Riefenstahl reunited with her husband Peter Jacob shortly after the war. Since neither Riefenstahl, nor her husband, nor her mother, nor any of her three assistants had ever joined the National Socialist Party, nor had any of them been politically active, she did not expect any problems from her captors. Unfortunately, she was wrong.14

Riefenstahl wrote: [We] were wakened by the sound of tires screeching, engines stopping abruptly, orders yelled, general din, and a hammering on the window shutters. Then the intruders broke through the door, and we saw Americans with rifles who stood in front of our bed and shone lights at us. None of them spoke German, but their gestures said: “Get dressed; come with us immediately.”

This was my fourth arrest, but now my husband was with me, and we got to know the victors from a very different aspect. They were no longer the casual gangling GIs; these were soldiers who treated us roughly.15

Riefenstahl described her fifth arrest: The jeep raced along the autobahns until … I was brought to the Salzburg Prison; there an elderly prison matron rudely pushed me into the cell, kicking me so hard that I fell to the ground; then the door was locked. There were two other women in the dark, barren room, and one of them, on her knees, slid about the floor, jabbering confusedly; then she began to scream, her limbs writhing hysterically. She seemed to have lost her mind. The other woman crouched on her bunk, weeping to herself. I found myself in a prison cell for the first time, and it is an unbearable feeling. I pounded on the door, becoming so desperate that I eventually smashed my body against it with all my strength, until I collapsed in exhaustion. I felt that incarceration was worse than capital punishment, and I did not think I could survive a long term of imprisonment.16

Riefenstahl was eventually released from American custody only to be imprisoned by the French shortly thereafter. The weeks she spent in Innsbruck women’s prison caused her to want to commit suicide. Riefenstahl was arrested at least four times in the French Zone, and was eventually transferred to the ruins of Breisach, where she suffered from starvation. She was later transferred to Königsfeld, where poverty and hunger were as great as they were in Breisach.17

Two years had passed since the end of the war, and no proper court trial had been approved for Riefenstahl. The French military government next transferred Riefenstahl to Freiburg, where she was locked up in a mental institution against her will. After this three-month incarceration, she was transferred to Königsfeld, where she was required to report weekly to the French military authorities in Villingen.18

Leni Riefenstahl was eventually forced to attend “denazification” hearings. Her first hearing was held in Villingen at the end of 1948. She won her case primarily because she had not been a party member. The French military government appealed her favorable ruling, and a second hearing was conducted in Freiburg in July 1949. Riefenstahl was again judged innocent, and the Baden State Commission on Political Purgation appealed this ruling. In her third trial the Baden commission concluded that Riefenstahl, though innocent of specific crimes, had consciously and willingly served the Reich. She was classified as a “fellow traveler,” the next-to-lowest of the five degrees of complicity.19

Riefenstahl initiated a final hearing in Berlin in spring 1952 to recover her villa in Dahlem, which had been held by the Allies since the end of the war. The vital matter of Riefenstahl’s postwar classification as a “fellow traveler” was settled at this hearing. Since this classification carried no prohibitions or penalties, Riefenstahl was free to work again, although her film projects were repeatedly thwarted after the war.20 POSTWAR REPUTATION Riefenstahl was widely criticized for positive statements she made about Hitler before the war.

For example, in February 1937 she told a reporter from the Detroit News: “To me, Hitler is the greatest man who ever lived. He truly is without fault, so simple and at the same time possessed of masculine strength. He asks nothing, nothing for himself. He’s really wonderful; he’s smart. He just radiates. All the great men of Germany—Frederick the Great, Nietzsche, Bismarck—had faults. Nor are those who stand with Hitler without fault. Only he is pure.”21

Despite such glowing statements, Riefenstahl’s association with Hitler was based primarily on advancing her artistic career. Jürgen Trimborn writes: Leni Riefenstahl began making films for the Führer in 1933, a career she could not have imagined one year before. Her cooperation with Hitler and the National Socialists was, in the end, based less on her fascination with their political program than on the opportunities that suddenly opened up to her in terms of artistic development. Of much greater importance to her than the “historical mission” of the Führer [were] her own career possibilities.

The “new Germany” promulgated by the National Socialists would also make room for her, the insufficiently recognized artist.22 Riefenstahl when incarcerated by the Allies was frequently forced to look at pictures from the German camps, and told that she must have known about these “death camps.” Steven Bach writes: She was forced to look at photographs, images of Dachau. “I hid my face in my hands,” she recalled, as if the ordeal of viewing them equaled the horrors they depicted. She was not permitted to look away from the “gigantic eyes peering helplessly into the camera” from the hells of Dachau, Auschwitz, Buchenwald, Bergen- Belsen, and other death camps, of which, she told the Americans, she had known nothing.23

Riefenstahl was telling the truth when she said she knew nothing about deaths in these German camps. In fact, the Allies were being dishonest with Riefenstahl by not telling her that most of the deaths in these camps occurred from natural causes. The Allies used the gruesome pictures from the German camps to induce guilt in Riefenstahl and the rest of the German people. Riefenstahl was also criticized for still supporting Hitler after witnessing the massacre of approximately 30 Jewish “civilians” in Konskie, Poland. This incident occurred after Polish partisans in Konskie had killed and mutilated a German officer and four soldiers. Such anti-partisan incidents were common during the war and did not indicate a German plan of genocide against the Jews. Riefenstahl was not complicit in this anti-partisan action, and she promptly terminated her film reporting of the war after this incident.24

Riefenstahl was smeared as a “Nazi monster” by many newspapers and magazines long after the war was over. Riefenstahl wrote: They forged anything and everything. French newspapers ran love letters supposedly written by [Julius] Streicher. L’Humanite and East German magazines put me on the same level as criminal perverts. There was nothing I wasn’t accused of. Other papers claimed that I had become a “cultural slave of the Soviets,” and had sold my films to Mos Film in Moscow for piles of rubles.25


Film scholar Dr. Rainer Rother writes: “There is no other famous artist from the period of the Nazi regime who has exhibited the kind of lasting influence as has Leni Riefenstahl.”26 Riefenstahl’s films will survive. Susan Sontag incorrectly wrote in regard to Riefenstahl’s films, “Nobody making films today alludes to Riefenstahl.” Steven Bach writes in response to Sontag’s statement: That was true, of course, if you discounted everything from George Lucas’s Star Wars to the Disney company’s The Lion King to every sports photographer alive to the ubiquitous, erotically charged billboards and slick magazine layouts to media politics that, everywhere in the world, remain both inspired and corrupted by work Leni perfected in Nuremberg and Berlin with a viewfinder that a film historian once warned suggested “the disembodied, ubiquitous eye of God.”27

Unfortunately, Riefenstahl’s reputation has been tarnished because she made films for Hitler. Her reputation will be fully restored once people realize that Hitler had never wanted war and did not commit genocide against European Jewry.28 Riefenstahl will then unreservedly be recognized as one of the greatest film artists of the 20th century.

 ENDNOTES: 1 Taschen, Angelikah, Leni Riefenstahl: Five Lives, New York: Taschen, 2001, 16. 2 Trimborn, Jürgen, Leni Riefenstahl: A Life, New York: Faber and Faber, Inc., 2002, 13, 20-23. 3 Ibid., 26, 29-31. 4 Ibid., 31-34. 5 Ibid., 38, 43, 48. 6 Bach, Steven, Leni: The Life and Work of Leni Riefenstahl, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007, 90-91. 7 Ibid., 86, 121, 31. 8 Rather, Ranier, Leni Riefenstahl: The Seduction of Genius, New York: Continuum, 2002, 57. 9 Bach, Steven, Leni: The Life and Work of Leni Riefenstahl, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007, 139-40. 10 Ibid., 142-43. 11 Ibid., 151, 164, 166. 12 Ibid., 186-91. 13 Ibid., 208, 223. 14 Riefenstahl, Leni, Leni Riefenstahl: A Memoir, New York: Picador USA, 1995, 308, 327. 15 Ibid., 308-09. 16 Ibid., 309-10. 17 Ibid., 325-26, 329-32. 18 Ibid., 333-35. 19 Bach, Steven, Leni: The Life and Work of Leni Riefenstahl, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007, 232-35. 20 Ibid., 235-37; Riefenstahl, Leni, Leni Riefenstahl: A Memoir, New York: Picador USA, 1995, 454. 21 Trimborn, Jürgen, Leni Riefenstahl: A Life, New York: Faber and Faber, Inc., 2002, 212. 22 Ibid., 80. 23 Bach, Steven, Leni: The Life and Work of Leni Riefenstahl, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007, 224. 24 Ibid., 188-92. 25 Riefenstahl, Leni, Leni Riefenstahl: A Memoir, New York: Picador USA, 1995, 455. 26 Trimborn, Jürgen, Leni Riefenstahl: A Life, New York: Faber and Faber, Inc., 2002, 274. 27 Bach, Steven, Leni: The Life and Work of Leni Riefenstahl, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007, 298. 28 Wear, John, Germany’s War: The Origins, Aftermath and Atrocities of World War II, Upper Marlboro, MD, AMERICAN FREE PRESS, 2014, 15-197, 340-89. (Available from AFP for $25 plus $4 S&H in the U.S.)

JOHN WEAR was born in 1953 in Houston. He graduated with a degree in accounting from Southern Methodist University in 1974 and passed the CPA exam later that year. He graduated from the University of Texas Law School in 1977 and passed the Texas bar in 1978. Wear, who is currently retired, worked most of his career as a CPA. His most recent employment was from 1994 to 2008 with Lacerte Software, a tax division of Intuit. Thanks to the generous help of two friends, Wear has a website at In addition to publishing his articles, the site has a Nuremberg Farce Quote of the Week section, a Wears War Movie Review section, and a Fake History Lie of the Month section. Readers are encouraged to sign up to receive Wear’s email newsletter. The Wears War website ( is designed to be informative and humorous. The goal is to bring history in accord with the facts while being entertaining and enjoyable to read.