Lebensborn—Popular History as Sex Fantasy
By Siegfried Egel
Mention “Lebensborn” to most Americans today, and they will
give you a blank stare. If anything, they would probably confuse it with
“Lebensraum” — German for living space, or elbow room. But a few decades ago,
the name had a suggestive ring. And the organization it stood for had been in
fact an SS affiliate. Little wonder, then, that the post-World War II rumor
mongers and fantasy peddlers had such a merry time with it. Even today, the man
in the street misremembers dimly that the Hitler regime had some sort of racist
scheme to operate human stud farms, with the party faithful acting as the studs
and blond-haired, blue-eyed girls as the recipients of their “service.” During
the incarceration of Dr. Udo Walendy, Siegfried Egel has been carrying forward
his work on His torische Tatsachen (Historical Facts). The following article
from that series is translated by Andrew Gray.
“Himmler’s baby factories,” “SS bordellos,” and
“breeding farms for the master race”—these were just a few of the provocative
terms invented by pornographers and anti-German propagandists which have been
used to describe Lebensborn e.V. (e.V. stands for “registered association,” or
in German, eingetragener Verein).
Actually this SS affiliate was nothing so
titillating or sinister. It was in fact nothing more than a system of lying-in
hospitals for pregnant women. But multitudes at the time leapt at the chance to
believe the worst whenever Germans were concerned—and, sadly, that is still the
case today.
Predictably enough, the U.S. Military Tribunal
rose to the occasion after the war and opened, on October 10, 1947, formal
proceedings against the surviving leaders of this organization. The prosecution
brought three principal counts against them.
Count 1 charged a crime against humanity based on
the abduction of foreign children for the purpose of Germanization or
extermination.
Count 2 charged plunder of public and private
property in Germany and the occupied territories.
Count 3 charged membership in a criminal
organization.
The trial
lasted five months. Ac cording to the verdict delivered on March 10, 1948, the
three chief SS officers in command of Lebensborn e.V. —Max Sollman, Gregor
Ebner and Günther Tesch — were acquitted on the first two counts and convicted
only on the third one, as of course the SS itself had been declared a “criminal
organization” in the prior Nuremberg kangaroo court.
The head nurse, Inge Viermetz, was acquitted on
all counts.
This should have put an end to all the propaganda
nonsense, but needless to say, it did no such thing. Lebensborn (the word
means, literally, “wellspring of life”) lives to this day in the popular
imagination as an SS sex park.
Revisionist historian Erich Kern later summarized
the facts about Lebensborn in these terms:
“Lebensborn e.V. was among the most exemplary
charitable organizations of its time. Founded in 1936, it grew to include a
total of 18 lying-in hospitals. These also served as temporary homes for
orphans. More than 11,000 children first saw the light of day in them. Unwed
mothers, it is true, were also accepted by these hospitals, but in such cases
every effort was made to arrange subsequent marriages with the biological
fathers, and the organization offered further care to the extent needed.
“This often included help in securing living
quarters. In special cases adoptions were arranged. The facilities, admittedly,
were not available to all German women. There were in fact racial requirements,
and proof of Aryan ancestry including all four grandparents had to be provided.
Women with obvious genetic defects were also excluded.
“But the facilities, though financed entirely from
monthly contributions by SS members, were not restricted to SS use alone.
During the war years, up to 90 percent of the women giving birth there were
wives of soldiers and officers of the army, navy and air force.”
As to the charge that Lebensborn participated in a
program for the Germanization of children abducted from the conquered
territories, the U.S. Military Tribunal found no substantiating evidence
whatsoever. On the contrary, it found Lebensborn policy was to make every
effort to bring orphaned children together with their surviving next of kin.
Children transferred to Lebensborn orphanage
facilities by other organizations always received the best possible care. No
instances of cruelty or sexual abuse of any sort were ever adduced.
These factual and judicial findings, however,
proved no barrier to the myth makers. Early in the 1950s, the German
illustrated magazine Revue ran a sensationalistic series purporting to show
Lebensborn as a “breeding farm for the master race.”
The nonsense reached its apogee in a late 1950s
German film, by Arthur Brauner, entitled simply Lebensborn e.V. In Brauner’s
cinematic fantasy these lying-in hospitals underwent a transmogrification into
sex parks. This film was an instant hit and was circulated throughout the
globe.
All attempts to block this defamation of German
men and women failed in the court system. As a result, to this day, the term
“Lebensborn” often arouses even in literate people a vision of beautiful,
scantily clad young women offering themselves to SS officers. It is a complete
fiction. Yet, when was truth ever a bar to popular misconceptions about the
Third Reich?
Actually, when you come right down to it, the
National Socialists and SS were quite prudish. So are most authoritarian
regimes. Loose sex is for democracies.