“Genocide Denial” Laws Get Setback in Switzerland

The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that a Turkish politician should not have been prosecuted for denying that the mass killing of Armenians by Ottoman Turkey was a genocide.

armenian_genocide_03

Judges ruled by 10 votes to seven that Dogu Perincek’s 2007 conviction for racial discrimination by a Swiss court infringed his right to free speech.

Mr Perincek had said “the Armenian genocide is a big fat lie”.

The ECHR ruled that Mr Perincek had not called for “hatred or intolerance”.

The chairman of Turkey’s left-wing Patriotic Party used a series of press conferences in 2005 to blame Western countries and Tsarist Russia for stoking tensions between Muslims and Armenians to undermine the Ottoman Empire, and argued that the resulting deaths in 1915 were not a premeditated attempt to wipe out an ethnic group.

The ECHR found that his statements related to an issue of “public interest” and “could not be regarded as affecting the dignity of the members of the Armenian community to the point of requiring a criminal law response”.

The court made a distinction with Holocaust denial, which judges said could always be seen as a form of incitement to racial hatred in certain countries.

armenian-genoicide-02

Denying that the Armenian killings were a genocide is illegal in Switzerland as well as Cyprus, Slovakia, and Greece.

Turkey denies committing genocide and says 500,000 people died, not 1.5 million as claimed by Armenia.

armenian-genoicide-01

The ECHR said it was up to international criminal courts to decide whether the killings were a genocide.

But it ruled that the Swiss courts appeared to have punished Mr Perincek “simply for voicing an opinion that diverged from the established ones in Switzerland”.

The ECHR’s Grand Chamber ruling is final and binding on all Council of Europe members.

The Swiss government said it would examine the judgement to assess whether any change was required to its anti-racism law—because this ruling has clearly opened the door on the legality of questioning the Jewish “holocaust” as well.

Related Articles

Europe at the Crossroads

Europe at the Crossroads

By Michael Walsh. Under the baleful influence of Wall Street and Washington Europe once again stands at the crossroads of history. A…

Tomorrow’s News Today

Tomorrow’s News Today

By Michael Walsh. The English novelist L. P Hartley penned those immortal words, “The past is a foreign country. They do things…

DNA and Ancient White Egypt

DNA and Ancient White Egypt

A new analysis of DNA from ancient Egyptian mummies, carried out by scientists from the University of Tuebingen in Germany, has revealed…

The H.L. Hunley Reveals its Last Secret

The H.L. Hunley Reveals its Last Secret

The H.L. Hunley—the world’s first successful attack submarine, in service with the Confederate Navy in 1864—has finally revealed its propulsion secret more…

Rise and Fall of the Jewish Reich

Rise and Fall of the Jewish Reich

By Mike Walsh. A study of Jewish involvement in worldwide Communist insurrections reveals as much between the lines as in them. Something…

Is Income Tax a Federal Fraud?

Is Income Tax a Federal Fraud?

By John Tiffany. Report on Internal Revenue Service: Is Income Tax a Federal Fraud?—The Continuing Scandal of 1935 to Present. The author…